Maine

  • State constitutional guarantees regarding right to education

    Case law and legislative history defining and interpreting the right to education

    • Carson v. Makin, 596 U.S. 767 (2022) (holding that a Maine law excluding religious schools from a tuition assistance program violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment).

    • MSAD 8 Bd. Of Dirs. v. Town of Fyre Island et al., 2020 ME 45, 229 A.3d 514 (holding that a town did not have the authority to withdraw from a school district because such action was not local and municipal in character).

    • Logiodice v. Trs. of Maine Cent. Inst., 296 F.3d 22 (1st Cir. 2002) (holding that if a student were expelled, the district would still be obliged to provide him with adequate schooling).

    • Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 1 v. Comm'r, Dep't of Educ., 659 A.2d 854 (Me. 1995) (holding that the Maine constitution does not guarantee a specific level or method of state funding for education, and instead, only requires the state to enforce the municipal obligation to support public education).

    • State v. McDonough, 468 A.2d 977 (Me. 1983) (holding that the state’s compulsory education law, which required either school attendance or an approved home instruction plan, did not violate the McDonoughs’ constitutional rights under either the state or U.S. constitutions, finding no constitutional right to unregulated home education). 

    • Opinion of the Justs., 261 A.2d 58 (Me. 1970) (holding that Article VIII of the Constitution of Maine is a mandate to insure the establishment of public schools, but that it does not prevent the promotion of education by other constitutional means).

    • McGary v. Barrows, 156 Me. 250, 259, 163 A.2d 747 (1960) (holding that the Sinclair Act does not violate Article VIII of the state constitution, reasoning that Article VIII is ‘mandatory not prohibitory,’ and that it is not a limitation upon legislative power in the field of education).

    • In re Opinion of the Justs., 153 Me. 469, 473, 145 A.2d 250 (1958) (holding that the provisions of Section 2 of Legislative Document 1637, which allow two or more municipalities to join together to form a new municipality known as a School Administrative District, which, after its formation, owns, operates, and controls all the public schools within the district, does not violate any provision of Article VIII of the state constitution).

    State constitutional protections regarding non-discrimination and equity

    Other relevant state constitutional civil rights protections

    See generally, Me. Const. art. I (Declaration of Rights).

  • State law equivalents to Title VI, Title IX, Section 504, and the Educational Opportunities Act (EEOA)

    Additional state civil rights protections that go beyond federal requirements (e.g., protections for LGBTQ+ students, multilingual learners, undocumented students)

    • Protections against Improper Use of Restraint and Seclusion in Schools:  Sec.1. 20-A MRSA §4014: "Use of seclusion and physical restraint.  See accompanying rule that sets forth permitted and unlawful uses of restraint and seclusion, required notification and documentation of incidents of restraint or seclusion, aggregate reporting of incidents to administrators and to the Maine Department of Education (DOE), notification to parents, response to multiple incidents of restraint or seclusion of a student, local and state complaint processes and Maine DOE approval of training programs.

    • Prohibition of hazing:

      • Me. Stat. tit. 20-A, § 6553: Requires the school board to adopt a policy which establishes that "injurious hazing," either on or off school property, by any student, staff member, group or organization affiliated with the public school is prohibited.  

    • Prohibition of bullying:

    • Protections for LGBTQ+ students: 

      • Me. Stat. tit. 5, § 4602: Governs unlawful educational discrimination, including discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. This law applies to:

      • Exempted from complying with nondiscrimination requirements on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity is any organization that is a “religious corporation, association or society that does not receive public funding[.]” Me. Stat. tit. 5, § 4602.

    • Protections for Multilingual Learners:

    • Protections for Students with Disabilities:

      • Children with Disabilities: Me. Stat. tit. 20-A, § 7201 et seq.: Statutes to provide all students with disabilities with equal educational opportunities. 

      • Provision of Early Childhood Special Education in School Administrative Units, P.L. 2023, c.643, part W: All School Administrative Units (SAUs) must offer early childhood special education services to preschool aged children with disabilities by July 1st, 2028. The Maine Department of Education's Commissioner oversees this effort and is supporting the Office of Special Services and Inclusive Education (OSSIE) to support the development of systems, policies, practices and procedures to do so.

      • Key Special Education Regulations to Support Students with Disabilities Enforce Right to Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE): Maine Unified Special Education Regulations 

    • Protections for Students Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing:

    State law protections regarding color of law or pattern/practice liability for law enforcement in schools

    Anti-discrimination protections under state human rights statutes

    Private right of action provisions under state civil rights and human rights statutes

    Identify whether state anti-discrimination laws also prohibit discrimination caused by disparate impact. If yes, does the state law allow a private right of action for disparate impact claims?

    •  The Maine Civil Rights Act does not prohibit discrimination caused by disparate impact.

    • The Maine Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination caused by disparate impact. It appears that the Act’s private right of action allows for disparate impact claims, at it states, “an aggrieved person may file a civil action in the Superior Court against the person or persons who committed the unlawful discrimination.” In addition, I did not identify case law or statutory, regulatory, or sub-regulatory guidance suggesting that the private right of action is limited to cases of disparate treatment. 

  • Is the right provided by state law conferred on the student, parent/guardian, or both? In other words, who can bring a claim under this law? 

    • Maine Civil Rights Act

      • The right is conferred upon the person whose exercise or enjoyment of rights have been interfered with, or attempted to be interfered with.

    • Maine Human Rights Act

      • The right is conferred upon an aggrieved person. “Aggrieved person” includes any person who claims to have been subject to unlawful discrimination on the basis of protected class status, including discrimination based on the person's known relationship or association with a member of a protected class and discrimination on the basis of perceived protected class status.  

    Does the specified law or policy provide protections against retaliation? What are the elements of a retaliation claim? Are protections against retaliation clearly spelled out in the law or policy?

    • Maine Civil Rights Act

      • The Maine Civil Rights Act does not explicitly provide protections against retaliation.

    • Maine Human Rights Act

      • The Maine Human Rights Act provides protections against retaliation. A person may not discriminate against any individual because that individual has opposed any act or practice that is unlawful under this Act or because that individual made a charge, testified, assisted or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under this Act. Further, it is unlawful for a person to coerce, intimidate, threaten or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of the rights granted or protected by this Act or because that individual has exercised or enjoyed, or has aided or encouraged another individual in the exercise or enjoyment of, those rights. See Me. Stat. tit. 5, § 4633.

    Statute of limitations for filing education-related state civil rights complaints (or state civil rights complaints broadly) or state human rights complaints?

    • Maine Civil Rights Act

      • All civil actions shall be commenced within 6 years after the cause of action accrues and not afterwards, except actions on a judgment or decree of any court of record of the United States, or of any state, or of a justice of the peace in this State, and except as otherwise specially provided. Me. Stat. tit. 14, § 752. No provision in the Maine Civil Rights Act specifically provides otherwise.

    • Maine Human Rights Act

      • Any aggrieved person, or any employee of the commission, may file a complaint under oath with the commission stating the facts concerning the alleged discrimination, except that a complaint must be filed with the commission not more than 300 days after the alleged act of unlawful discrimination. Me. Stat. tit. 5, § 4611.

      • In any action filed under this Act by the commission or by any other person: The action must be commenced not more than either 2 years after the act of unlawful discrimination complained of or 90 days after any of the occurrences listed under section 4622, subsection 1, paragraphs A to D, whichever is later. Me. Stat. tit. 5, § 4613.

    Are there areas where the state laws provide more protections than federal law? What are those areas? 

    • See above.

How do I file a complaint about discrimination in a K-12 public school in Maine? 

Maine Human Rights Commission

Note: Individuals can submit questions, comments, and concerns to the Maine Department of Education by completing an online form. The online form, however, states that complaints of discrimination must be filed at the office of the Maine Human Rights Commission. See Maine Department of Education, Questions, Comments, and Concerns (last visited July 27, 2025).

  • Who is eligible to file (students, parents, advocates, others)?

    • Any aggrieved person may file a complaint with the Maine Human Rights Commission (the “Commission”). 

    • Any employee of the Commission may file a complaint with the Commission alleging an act or practice of unlawful discrimination.

    • If the aggrieved person is a minor child at the time of filing, the named party in a complaint must be the child's parent or legal guardian, filing on behalf of the minor child, and the child's name will remain confidential until the child reaches the age of majority. If the aggrieved person reaches the age of majority while the complaint is pending at the Commission, the investigation will continue with the aggrieved person proceeding on their own behalf without requiring amendment of the complaint. 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.02.

    Are there other administrative processes someone may have to exhaust before initiating a complaint? (i.e., going through school’s, district’s, or other agency’s process first, etc.)

    • The only administrative processes discussed on the Maine Human Rights Commission’s website are the filing of a complaint and the submitting of an intake form. There is no other information indicating that an individual must exhaust some other administrative process before filing a complaint or submitting an intake form. See Maine Human Rights Commission, File a Complaint (last visited July 31, 2025).

    How to initiate the process (relevant websites, standard forms, submission locations)

    • Filing a Complaint:

      • Discrimination complaints must be filed with the Commission within 300 days after the alleged act of unlawful discrimination. For most types of claims, that 300-day deadline starts from the time that a reasonable person would have become aware of facts supporting a claim of discrimination. A complaint must be filed under oath, after being signed in front of a notary public. A complaint must identify the complainant and their address, the entity or person responsible for discrimination ("respondent") and their address, the last date of discrimination, and sufficient facts to put the respondent on notice of what the alleged discrimination is and its basis. See Maine Human Rights Commission, Frequently Asked Questions (last visited July 31, 2025); 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.02.

      • A Word Document version of the Education Complaint can be accessed on the following webpage: https://www.maine.gov/mhrc/file

      • Complaints of discrimination must be filed at the office of the Maine Human Rights Commission, 51 State House Station, Augusta, Maine 04333-0051. Complaints filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) pursuant to work sharing agreements between the Commission and EEOC and HUD shall be deemed filed with the Commission on the date of filing with EEOC or HUD. See Maine Human Rights Commission, File a Complaint (last visited July 31, 2025); 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.02.

    • Submitting an Intake Form:

      • An intake questionnaire is different from a complaint in that it is less formal and does not need to be notarized. See Maine Human Rights Commission, Frequently Asked Questions (last visited July 31, 2025).

      • Completing the Intake Questionnaire does not necessarily mean that a complaint of discrimination has been filed. After the Maine Human Rights Commission receives the information provided, the Intake Officer will either (1) type a complaint of discrimination and send it to the submitter for their review and notarized signature or, (2) if the information is not sufficient to draft a complaint, call the submitter to discuss their allegations further. See Maine Human Rights Commission, Instructions for Intake Form (last visited July 31, 2025). 

      • A print and mail version of the General Intake Questionnaire can be accessed here: https://www.maine.gov/mhrc/sites/maine.gov.mhrc/files/inline-files/General_Intake.pdf

      • The electronic version of the Intake Form can be accessed here: https://mainehumanrightscommission.formstack.com/forms/intakes_2025

      • Because complaints of discrimination must be received by the commission within 300 days of the alleged act of discrimination, and intake submissions can lead to complaints of discrimination, it is inferred that intake forms should be submitted within fewer than 300 days of the alleged act of discrimination.  

    Can complaints be filed anonymously or confidentially?

    • The Maine Human Rights Commission’s website does not specify whether complaints can be filed anonymously or confidentially. The Commission’s FAQ page, however, states the following: “The information in your file [regarding the investigation] remains confidential until the case is either administratively dismissed or listed on a Commission Meeting Agenda. The information is shared with the parties and with their legal representatives during the investigation as long as we have a properly completed Non-Disclosure Form on file.” See Maine Human Rights Commission, Frequently Asked Questions (last visited July 31, 2025).

    Are there language access requirements for complaint processes?

    • The Maine Human Rights Commission has developed and implemented a Language Assistance Plan to address the identified needs of the limited English proficiency (“LEP”) populations served by the Commission. In order to provide meaningful access to LEP persons, the Commission must first identify those who need language assistance.  Commission staff may identify people who are LEP persons through communication in written, telephonic or face-to-face form.

      • In person. The Commission has posted an I Speak poster in its reception area, which is an effective tool for an LEP person to communicate the language the person speaks.  Commission staff will direct people to the I Speak poster when it is apparent that they are having difficulty speaking or understanding English.  The staff member will then utilize the language services described in this Plan.

      • In writing. If a staff member receives a written communication in a foreign language, the staff member will contact the Executive Director to determine the best way to proceed.

      • Telephone. If a staff member receives a telephone call from a person who speaks a foreign language or ASL, or has a speech or language disability, and is having difficulty communicating in English, the staff member will use a telephone interpreting service described below.

      • Record keeping. When staffers are likely to have repeated contacts with a person who is LEP (e.g., ongoing intake or complaint investigation), staffers will make appropriate notations in the paper and electronic files identifying the person as LEP, indicating the language spoken, and listing the language assistance tools requested and utilized. See Maine Human Rights Commission, Language Assistance Plan (last visited July 31, 2025).

    Are there known barriers to accessing enforcement (filing fees, documentation requirements)?

    • Complaints must be sworn to under oath by the aggrieved person before a Notary Public or other person authorized by law to administer oaths, or before a representative of the EEOC or HUD pursuant to work sharing agreements signed between the Commission and the EEOC and HUD. 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.02.

    • If the complaint is initially filed electronically, the Complainant must promptly file an original version of the signed, notarized complaint in person or by mail. See 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.02. 

    Can complainants have advocates or legal representation?

    Are complainants entitled to legal representation or other advocates to file or at any point in the process?

    • No.

  • What are the required elements of the civil rights claim?

    • It is unlawful educational discrimination in violation of this [Maine Human Rights] Act, on the basis of sex, sexual orientation or gender identity, physical or mental disability, ancestry, national origin, race, color or religion, to:  

      • A. Exclude a person from participation in, deny a person the benefits of, or subject a person to, discrimination in any academic, extracurricular, research, occupational training or other program or activity;

      • B. Deny a person equal opportunity in athletic programs;

      • C. Apply any rule concerning the actual or potential familial status or marital status of a person or to exclude any person from any program or activity because of pregnancy or related conditions or because of sex or sexual orientation or gender identity;

      • D. Deny a person admission to the institution or program or to fail to provide equal access to and information about an institution or program through recruitment; or

      • E. Deny a person financial assistance availability and opportunity. Me. Stat. tit. 5, § 4602(1)

    Who reviews claims and what timeframes apply?

    • When the Commission receives your signed Complaint of Discrimination, a Case Number is assigned, and the Respondent is provided with a copy of your Complaint along with a Request for Information and Documents. You will receive a copy of the material that is sent to the Respondent. The Respondent generally has one month to respond to your allegations. Extensions of time may be allowed at the discretion of the Commission. See Maine Human Rights Commission, Frequently Asked Questions (last visited July 31, 2025).

    What type of investigation may occur?

    • As soon as possible, an Investigator will be assigned to your case. You will be notified of the name of the Investigator and further communication should be made with that person. The Investigator will review your file and notify both parties as to how the investigation will proceed.

    • In some cases the Investigator may decide to hold a Fact Finding Conference or Issues and Resolution Conference. In other cases they may decide to conduct an interview with you either by phone or in person. Or they may decide that there is sufficient information in the file from both parties to conclude the investigation and issue an Investigator’s Report.

    • You should understand that the Investigator does not represent you or the Respondent. The job of the Investigator is to look at all of the information provided by both sides and to determine if there has been a violation of the Maine Human Rights Act. See Maine Human Rights Commission, Frequently Asked Questions (last visited July 31, 2025).

    Who participates in investigations?

    • The investigator assigned to the case, parties to the investigation, and legal counsel of the parties to the investigation (if applicable). Further, if there’s a fact-finding conference, the investigator may invite witnesses or other persons to attend. See Maine Human Rights Commission, Frequently Asked Questions (last visited July 31, 2025).

    Are complainants entitled to a hearing of any kind? If yes, what are complainants entitled to during the hearing?

    • No. 

    What privacy/confidentiality protections exist?

    • Prior to the conclusion of an investigation, all information possessed by the Commission relating to the investigation is confidential and may not be disclosed, except that the Commission and its employees have discretion to disclose such information as is reasonably necessary to further the investigation. An attorney will not be provided with information regarding an investigation prior to its conclusion unless the attorney (or the attorney's law firm) has entered an appearance on behalf of a party to the complaint.

    • The parties to the complaint shall be required, as a condition of the investigation, to agree to maintain the confidentiality of all information that they learn through the Commission's investigatory process during the pendency of the investigation, including information learned through documents produced directly by another party when those documents are produced as part of the Commission's process. The willful failure by a party to comply with the requirement of confidentiality may result in sanctions, including, but not limited to, adverse inferences being drawn, the Commission's refusal to provide further information in the record to the party or limiting the conditions on which information may be provided to them, and/or dismissal of the complaint.

    • The complaint and any evidence collected during the investigation that is a “public record” as defined by 1 M.R.S. § 402, other than data identifying persons who are not parties, shall become available to the public for review and inspection, upon written request, upon issuance of a letter of dismissal or upon listing of the complaint on a published Commission meeting agenda. The complaint and evidence collected may be used as evidence in any subsequent proceeding, civil or criminal. 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.05.

    • If the complaint alleges violation of the MHRA that relates to a disability, the medical/disability information may be redacted from the complaint sent with notification to the Respondent; once the Respondent provides a signed agreement to maintain information it learns through the Commission process as confidential, the Commission will upon request send an unredacted copy of the complaint to the Respondent. 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.03.

    • Everything said or done during and as part of the Commission's informal endeavors to eliminate unlawful discrimination by conference, conciliation and persuasion is confidential and may not be disclosed without the written consent of the parties concerned or used as evidence in any subsequent proceeding, civil or criminal, except in a civil action alleging a breach of the agreement filed by the Commission or a party. Notwithstanding this provision, the Commission and its employees have discretion to disclose such information to a party as is reasonably necessary to facilitate conciliation. Post-finding conciliation agreements to which the Commission is a signatory are public records. 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.09.

    Are school districts required to publicly post civil rights complaint procedures?

    • I have not identified a state law or rule requiring school Maine school districts to publicly post civil rights

  • What is the appeals process, if any?

    • The Commission’s Executive Director may, in their discretion, administratively dismiss complaints of discrimination for reasons including, but not limited to, lack of jurisdiction, failure to substantiate the complaint of discrimination, and failure to file a complaint of discrimination within 300 days of the date of alleged discrimination. Requests for reconsideration of the Executive Director’s decision to administratively dismiss a complaint may be made only by a party to the complaint or by a member of the Commission’s staff. Requests for reconsideration shall be made only where there has been a significant factual or legal error or omission, or to bring forth new information that could not have been presented previously. All requests for reconsideration shall be subject to the discretion of the Executive Director. 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.02

    • If you want to file a civil action directly in Superior Court, and not have the Maine Human Rights Commission investigate your complaint, and if your complaint has been filed with the Commission for 180 days or more, you may ask for a Right-to-Sue letter. The Commission will issue you the letter, and immediately stop the investigation of your complaint of discrimination. We will administratively dismiss your complaint upon your request for a Right-to-Sue letter. If you request a Right-to-Sue letter after the Commission issues an Investigator’s Report and publishes the case on a Commission agenda, the Commission is not required to issue the letter to you. At that time, the Commission has discretion not to issue the Right-to-Sue letter and usually refuses to do so, because the Commission staff has invested time and resources in completing the investigation process. Maine Human Rights Commission, Frequently Asked Questions (last visited July 27, 2025); see 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.02.

    • The Commission is the State agency that is responsible for investigating complaints of discrimination under the Maine Human Rights Act. This is different from a court action. Following the investigation, if the case is not resolved and you wish to pursue a binding order under the Maine Human Rights Act, you must file an action in the Maine Superior Court. The Commission itself will file a court action in only a small number of cases in which it finds reasonable grounds to believe that unlawful discrimination occurred. The deadline for filing a court action is the greater of either 2 years after the act of alleged discrimination or 90 days from a dismissal, right-to-sue letter, or failed conciliation. Maine Human Rights Commission, Frequently Asked Questions (last visited July 31, 2025).

    Are remedies legally enforceable once a violation is found?

    • Signed conciliation agreements entered into during an investigation by the Maine Human Rights Commission  are legally enforceable.

    Are there other administrative processes that must be exhausted before taking legal action?

    • None identified. 

    Do state agencies publish complaint outcome data?

    What enforcement mechanisms exist for non-compliance?

    • The Maine Human Rights Commission does not have enforcement power. However, when post-determination conciliation efforts have failed, the Commission Counsel or their designee is authorized to file a civil action in the Superior Court seeking appropriate relief, including, but not limited to, temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions. See 94-348-2 Me. Code R. § 2.10.

State Attorney General Enforcement Actions

  • Has the AG taken civil rights actions involving education in the past 5 years?

    • According to MaineBeacon.com, as of July 22, 2025, the Maine Attorney General and a coalition of other attorneys general are suing the Trump administration over restrictions on federally funded programs serving immigrants in the U.S. without legal status. One such program is the Head Start preschool program.

    • On April 16, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice announced enforcement actions against the state of Maine for violating Title IX for “failing to protect women and girls in sports.” On the same day, the Maine Attorney General issued a statement regarding the suit, stating that the matter is “about the protections afforded by Title IX and the Maine Human Rights Act” and that his office looked forward to representing the  state of Maine and defending the rule of law. 

    What enforcement powers does the AG possess in education-related cases?

    The Attorney General may bring a civil action for injunctive or other appropriate equitable relief in order to protect the peaceable exercise or enjoyment of the rights secured by the United States Constitution or the laws of the United States or of the rights secured by the Constitution of Maine or the laws of the State whenever any person, whether or not acting under color of law:  

    • (A) Violates section 4684‑B; or 

    • (B) Intentionally interferes or attempts to intentionally interfere with the exercise or enjoyment by any other person of those secured rights by: 

      • (1) Physical force or violence against a person; 

      • (2) Damage or destruction of property or trespass on property; 

      • (3) Threatening physical force or violence against a person; 

      • (4) Threatening damage or destruction of property or trespass on property; or 

      • (5) Engaging in any conduct that would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress or to fear death or bodily injury to that person or to a close relation. 

    For purposes of this subparagraph, "close relation" and "emotional distress" have the same meanings as in Title 17‑A, section 210‑A, subsection 2, paragraph B and paragraph D, respectively. Me. Stat. tit. 5, § 4681

    Does the AG accept individual education civil rights complaints, or does the office only take on broad investigations? (if they do individual complaints, would want to answer the below complaint process questions for the AG’s office)

    • The Maine Attorney General’s office does not appear to have a formal process for accepting individual education civil rights complaints directly from the public. See Maine Attorney General (last visited July 27, 2025).

    The Maine Attorney General administers the Civil Rights Team Project, a school-based preventative program. The mission of the Civil Rights Team Project (CRTP) is to increase the safety of elementary, middle level, and high school students by reducing bias-motivated behaviors and harassment in Maine schools. The CRTP accomplishes this by supporting student civil rights teams in Maine schools. The CRTP and the student civil rights teams are active in engaging school communities in thinking and talking about issues related to: race and skin color, national origin and ancestry, religion, disabilities, gender (including gender identity and expression), and sexual orientation. The CRTP, however, is more of an educational and community engagement initiative and not an enforcement mechanism. See Maine Attorney General, Civil Rights in Schools (last visited July 27, 2025).

  • Does the AG have an office/section dedicated to education or education civil rights issues? (If the AG has sections or offices dedicated to education or children's rights issues, please identify that office when responding to relevant questions above and with respect to the complaint process below.)

    The Maine Attorney General does not appear to have an office or section dedicated to education or education civil rights issues. The Maine Attorney General, however, administers the Civil Rights Team Project, which is discussed above. See Maine Attorney General (last visited July 27, 2025); Maine Attorney General, Civil Rights in Schools (last visited July 27, 2025).

Other State Enforcement Systems

N/A